How We Arrived at 24%: The Data Behind the Readiness Score

Twenty-four percent of survey respondents demonstrated a clear foundational understanding of core AAM concepts across Michigan’s airport network. This figure reflects overall awareness based on the survey responses received and provides a snapshot of where airports currently stand on key AAM fundamentals: planning, regulation, infrastructure, use cases, and partnerships.

Getty Images, for Unsplash+

1. Airport Planning & ALP Awareness

Competency Rate: 21%

• 19% understood that AAM infrastructure may trigger updates to ALPs or master plans

• 28% identified basic siting considerations (location, safety areas, utility proximity)

• 14% recognized potential impacts on long-term land use or utility needs

  
  

2. Regulatory Awareness (107 / 108 / BVLOS/etc.)

Competency Rate: 24%

• 32% correctly distinguished operational limits under Part 107

• 26% demonstrated baseline awareness that BVLOS is not broadly enabled

• 18% understood that existing COAs apply only in specific, narrow operational contexts

  
  

3. Infrastructure Requirements (Charging, Power, Siting)

Competency Rate: 25%

• 41% aware that AAM requires dedicated charging infrastructure

• 22% understood that electrical upgrades or utility coordination may be necessary

• 17% identified siting or layout considerations distinct from conventional aviation equipment

• 36% knew or could report their airport’s available electrical capacity (kW/kVA)

  
  

4. Use Case Identification & Local Relevance

Competency Rate: 27%

• 47% identified at least one realistic early use case (medical logistics, inspections, public safety, etc.)

• 31% tied a use case to a local industry, partner, or regional asset

• 16% recognized that early AAM activity will begin with small UAS/logistics rather than passenger eVTOL

  
  

5. Partnership Readiness & Engagement Awareness

Competency Rate: 29%

• 38% aware of OFME or MDOT-AERO AAM initiatives

• 29% demonstrated general awareness of partner categories (operators, utilities, agencies)

• 21% understood that utilities and/or PPP structures will play an early role in planning

  
  

What the Data Indicates

Together, these results illustrate an airport network that is broadly aware of AAM but still developing depth across several foundational areas. Respondents generally recognize that AAM will influence future operations, yet detailed understanding of regulatory frameworks, electrical infrastructure requirements, and planning implications remains limited. Use-case identification is advancing, showing that many airports can envision how AAM may support local or regional needs, though assumptions about timing and technology readiness are often misaligned. Partnership awareness is emerging, but airports are still early in forming structured relationships with operators, utilities, and state programs. Overall, the 24% benchmark reflects a statewide environment that is engaged, curious, and beginning to orient toward AAM — with substantial opportunities for coordinated education and readiness support moving forward.

Published November 18th, 2025

By: Aaron Thelenwood, Founder